Ozymandias and the Grecian Urn Paper

Even though Ozymandias by Percy Shelley and Ode to a classical Urn by behind Keats sound alike(p) genuinely distinct types of songs, they simmer down sh atomic number 18 some of the same characteristics. In Ozymandias, Shelley tells a story of how a man found a ancient statue of a major power, with the dustup My name is Ozymandias, office of Kings,/ Look on my Works, ye Might, and despair The statue was broken into pieces, and the convey was austere, with nonhing to look on (11).In Ode to a Grecian Urn, Keats is spea fagot to an ancient urn and describing the unchanging pictures that argon on it. These poems are very different in how their intents move with the passing of time and in the senses that they lift in the lecturer, but very confusable in the romanticistic characteristics that they represent. Ozymandias and Ode to a Grecian Urn are very different in how the statue and the urn interact with the passing of time. In Ozymandias, Shelley shows how a man do object is prohibited in time by spirit.Not only is the statue destroyed, but it is also obvious that the township has also been destroyed when Shelley verbalizes that, Nothing beside remains. Round the fall apart/ Of that colossal Wreck, boundless and bare (12-13). Nature has the tycoon to destroy everything that a man can make, anything from a simple statue to an finished town. However, Ode to a Grecian Urn is an entire poem about a manmade object that has withstood the line of achievement of time and anything genius threw its way.Keats states that even When old maturate shall this generation waste/ Thou shalt remain (46-47). Keats does not even acknowledge the fact that nature could destroy the urn in a split second. Since the urn is a awkward historian, it has been around for a while, meaning it has probably been finished some version of a natural contingency or at the very least a rough storm, and nature still has not chosen to destroy it (3). Shelleys poem and K eatss poem also differ in the feelings that they invoke in the lecturer. Ozymandias has a very off-putting sound to it.Shelley puts words that curb negative connotations to them like when he is describing the king with a frown/ And wrinkled lip, and sneer of refrigerating command (4-5). The poem gives the reader a feeling of loneliness and emptiness by using lines like The lone and level sands and boundless and bare (14, 13). In Ode to a Grecian Urn, the connotations of the words that Keats uses are completely resistance. Keats even describes the urn as being competent to tell A flowery tale more(prenominal) sweetly than their rhyme (4).Keats then goes on to state that the melodies unheard/ Are sweeter therefore, ye soft pipes, play on (11-12). These lines are so light and pretty oddly compared to the harshness of Shelleys poem. Keats describes the beautiful pictures on the urn end-to-end the rest of the poem, even qualification a chip in sound peaceful. Even though the wa y the poems objects interact with the passing of time and the feelings the poems invoke in the reader differ greatly, the romantic characteristics that both poems symbolize are very similar.Ironically, the opposite parallels of the two poems concord a way of representing a romantic mindset. For example, the romantics believed that nature is conjectural to teach. In Ozymandias, nature destroys a statue and a town that had arisen from greed and the abuse of power. The king is stated to have a sneer of cold command and a heart that fed his own desires (4,8). The trunkless legs of stone and a shattered visage makes it sound like nature was not very happy with the kings show of authority (2, 4).In Ode to a Grecian Urn, the manmade object not being destroyed by nature can still teach the reader. The urn was not made for power and greed, but to show beauty and love. The urn depicts some(prenominal) scenes of nature and peacefulness. Another similarity that both poems take is that they show the insignificance of something that is supposed to be great, like a king, and the value of something that is supposed to be cut-and-dry, like an urn. at a time again, in Ozymandias, the king and his great town are destroyed.This faces like Shelleys way of rooting for the revolutions, of making a king not so in-chief(postnominal) anymore. After all is said and done, the lone and level sands stretch far away (14). No matter whether one is a king or a peasant, everyone dies, and in the end, being a king does not make you greater than a peasant. In Ode to a Grecian Urn, Keats glorifies the common urn. He makes the urn, which could have probably been found in many homes, search special to the reader. Like many romantics, he took an ordinary item and turned it into an extraordinary one.Shelleys Ozymandias and Keatss Ode to a Grecian Urn differ in the ship canal that the statue and the urn interact with the passing of time and in the feelings that they invoke in the readers howe ver, they still ironically share similar romantic characteristics. The poems may not seem very comparable at first, but once the reader considers what each poet is trying to convey, they do not seem so different after all. Again, it is the ironic and opposite parallels that actually add up to express the same beliefs of both poets.